Moral Law Includes Murder of Nonhumans

Why do non-vegans not understand murder of nonhuman animals? Why do they tout definitions from a dictionary to prove murder does not apply to nonhumans? They are restricted to convention and tradition to find their definitions of reality, and lack the moral dimension of including nonhuman animals to a definition because they willfully ignore what they don’t want to accept beyond one’s own view, idiots.

If society was more morally concerned towards nonhuman animals, the conventional definition of murder would also include nonhuman animals. The current condition of consciousness would be reflected in word definitions. But since the current condition of consciousness does not recognize nonhuman animals as being morally worthy, then murder does not apply.

For those of us that do include nonhuman animals in morality, murder does apply to nonhuman animals because we recognize the unlawful killing as murder. What law? Moral Law!

Non-vegans, carnists, do not recognize this, because for them , it is moral and lawful to kill nonhuman animals. It is all from consciousness. Their consciousness does not recognize moral value in nonhuman animals, and therefore cannot apply definition of morality towards them, like the word murder. Their is no unlawful killing, hence no murder, because they do not value nonhuman animals in the morally recognized capacity that would permit understanding murder of nonhuman animals. They lack moral comprehension, hence cannot change their definitions to include nonhuman animals.

Only in the 18th and 19th century did some states start making laws for killing of a slave as murder. Prior to that, it was not murder to kill a slave. They were not included in a moral comprehension. They were mere property. There is a similar social justice change is happening now, where some people are waking up to how nonhuman animals are not property.

So again, why can’t some people understand murder of nonhuman animals? They are too stuck in themselves, they are idiots (idiom), a focus on one’s own view and ignoring the reality of truth and morality. Just like enslavers of others human animals were idiots who ignored and chose not recognize moral comprehension of others, only focused on the identification corresponding to themselves that they chose to recognize, so too are carnists idiots who ignore and only focus on identification that more closely corresponds to themselves, what is most like their own, one’s own. They are idiots, ignoring moral identification beyond what they view as similar to one’s own, and therefore can’t recognize the limitation in a conventional current conditioning of the definition of a word symbol, they chose not to expand their moral circle of identification of others.

Facebook original comment source. Facebook Note.


  • Low consciousness and moral relativism (in this case cultural relativism) is the reason why people have this attitude, yet people wonder why they suffer? Well because of this attitude, but they don’t want to acknowledge that since they somehow think they can get away with their subjective attitudes born out of unconsciousness, apathy, and their selfish sense of comfort things will never change.

    People think the world revolves around their thoughts and beliefs (a form of solipsism), but the world doesn’t work that way. Anyone that understands universal law knows this, yet most people don’t nor want to!

  • Dan Shultz

    Your implication that veganism will be the start to end the evil in the world is not logical. Your calling omnivores “idiots” several times does not give credence to what you are saying.. If killing animals for food is wrong because we are committing murder. Are not plants living beings? Even if we did not kill anything for food we kill things every day and don’t even realize it. Bugs, mites, even stuff in and on our body.This is the very reason that until this dualistic matrix is dissolved and no being is reliant on anothers sacrifice for it’s own survival we will never truly be free. For now, we kill for our own survival (natural law) but others may kill for other reasons, most of them not good.

    • Sterling Latimer

      What a well thought out, legitimate argument that you totally came up with all on your own and is a totally genuine argument. The PLANT holocaust!!! XD fuck you XD

Have something to say? Please let me know.